Is Green Landscaping Group AB (publ)’s (STO:GREEN) ROE Of 3.3% Concerning?

Many investors are still learning about the various metrics that can be useful when analysing a stock. This article is for those who would like to learn about Return On Equity (ROE). To keep the lesson grounded in practicality, we’ll use ROE to better understand Green Landscaping Group AB (publ) (STO:GREEN).

Return on equity or ROE is an important factor to be considered by a shareholder because it tells them how effectively their capital is being reinvested. In short, ROE shows the profit each dollar generates with respect to its shareholder investments.

See our latest analysis for Green Landscaping Group

How Do You Calculate Return On Equity?

The formula for ROE is:

Return on Equity = Net Profit (from continuing operations) ÷ Shareholders’ Equity

So, based on the above formula, the ROE for Green Landscaping Group is:

3.3% = kr7.2m ÷ kr219m (Based on the trailing twelve months to December 2019).

The ‘return’ is the yearly profit. That means that for every SEK1 worth of shareholders’ equity, the company generated SEK0.03 in profit.

Does Green Landscaping Group Have A Good ROE?

By comparing a company’s ROE with its industry average, we can get a quick measure of how good it is. However, this method is only useful as a rough check, because companies do differ quite a bit within the same industry classification. As shown in the graphic below, Green Landscaping Group has a lower ROE than the average (9.8%) in the Commercial Services industry classification.

More

That certainly isn’t ideal. That being said, a low ROE is not always a bad thing, especially if the company has low leverage as this still leaves room for improvement if the company were to take on more debt. When a company has low ROE but high debt levels, we would be cautious as the risk involved is too high. Our risks dashboard should have the 5 risks we have identified for Green Landscaping Group.

Why You Should Consider Debt When Looking At ROE

Most companies need money — from somewhere — to grow their profits. The cash for investment can come from prior year profits (retained earnings), issuing new shares, or borrowing. In the case of the first and second options, the ROE will reflect this use of cash, for growth. In the latter case, the debt required for growth will boost returns, but will not impact the shareholders’ equity. That will make the ROE look better than if no debt was used.

Green Landscaping Group’s Debt And Its 3.3% ROE

It’s worth noting the high use of debt by Green Landscaping Group, leading to its debt to equity ratio of 2.29. Its ROE is quite low, even with the use of significant debt; that’s not a good result, in our opinion. Debt does bring extra risk, so it’s only really worthwhile when a company generates some decent returns from it.

Conclusion

Return on equity is one way we can compare its business quality of different companies. A company that can achieve a high return on equity without debt could be considered a high quality business. If two companies have the same ROE, then I would generally prefer the one with less debt.

But ROE is just one piece of a bigger puzzle, since high quality businesses often trade on high multiples of earnings. It is important to consider other factors, such as future profit growth — and how much investment is required going forward. So you might want to take a peek at this data-rich interactive graph of forecasts for the company.

Story continues